BY DIMOSTHENIS VASILOUDIS

In the realm of history, where facts interlace with myths, one question has persisted like a lingering shadow over the holiday season: Is Christmas truly a pagan rip-off? It's a question that has tantalized the curious minds of historians and skeptics alike, invoking tales of intrigue and influence. The narrative suggests that Christmas, the beloved Christian celebration of Christ's birth, bears a striking resemblance to pagan revelries like Saturnalia and Sol Invictus, lurking in the shadows of antiquity.

But what if this narrative, like so many historical whispers, held more fiction than fact? Let’s embark on a journey to peel back the layers of time, dust off ancient manuscripts, and uncover the genuine story behind Christmas. It's a story that transcends the centuries, blending faith, tradition, and a hint of controversy.

Join me as we traverse the annals of history, distinguishing between synchronistic adaptations and deliberate rejections, examining the origins of Christmas celebrations, and unearthing the truth about December 25 as the chosen date. In this quest for historical authenticity, we'll challenge the prevailing belief and illuminate the lesser-known facets of this cherished holiday. Welcome to a scholarly exploration of the age-old inquiry: Is Christmas truly a pagan rip-off, or does its story carry deeper, more profound roots?

The Alleged Connection to Pagan Celebrations

One of the prevailing narratives regarding Christmas suggests that it was created as a Christian response to pagan festivities, specifically Saturnalia and Sol Invictus. Saturnalia, a Roman winter festival, was notorious for its debauchery and the worship of the god Saturn. Sol Invictus, on the other hand, marked the end of the winter solstice, celebrated on December 25 by the Roman emperor. According to this narrative, early Christians co-opted these pagan festivals to make Christianity more appealing.

Roots of Christmas: Synchronistic or Deliberate Rejection?

To truly understand the origins of Christmas, we need to distinguish between two possibilities: a synchronistic copycat or a deliberate rejection. Early Christians did indeed adapt and Christianize some pagan festivals, but their motivation was not to mimic paganism but rather to transform it. Christmas, as a celebration of Christ's birth, did not necessarily begin as a pagan festival, even if it happened to fall on the same date as Saturnalia and Sol Invictus.

Christian testimonies before the year 274 placed the birth of Jesus on December 25

The absence of early references to Christmas celebrations by prominent church fathers like Irenaeus and Tertullian suggests that the celebration of Christ's birth was not initially on the ecclesiastical calendar. Furthermore, Origen even ridiculed Roman celebrations of birth anniversaries, indicating a lack of association between Christmas and pagan festivities.

The first mention of December 25 as Jesus's birthday comes from a mid-fourth-century almanac called the Philocalian Calendar. This places the celebration well before Constantine's conversion and during a time when Christians were cautious about connections to pagan practices. Therefore, the origins of Christmas can be traced back to the second half of the third century, suggesting it was not a pagan imitation.

Hippolytus of Rome, who lived until 235 CE, made a noteworthy claim in his commentary on the book of the prophet Daniel. He stated that Jesus was born eight days before the Kalends of January, which corresponds to December 25th. His assertion suggests that December 25th was considered the date of Jesus' birth during his time.

In the early 4th century, Christian texts like "De solstitiis" proposed that Jesus was born six months after John the Baptist, who, according to the text, was born on the summer solstice. This further reinforces the idea that December 25th was regarded as the birthdate of Jesus within early Christian tradition.

Sextus Julius Africanus, a prominent Christian historian of the early 3rd century, played a key role in the development of the Christian liturgical calendar, particularly with respect to the date of Christmas. His contributions are especially significant considering the context of his era, a time when Christian thought was still in its formative stages and subject to a myriad of cultural and religious influences.

Africanus is best known for his work "Chronographiae," which is one of the earliest attempts to create a chronological account of the history of the world from a Christian perspective. In this work, he proposed that the Annunciation, the event where the Angel Gabriel announced to the Virgin Mary that she would give birth to Jesus, occurred on March 25. Consequently, he deduced that the birth of Christ must have taken place on December 25. This calculation is based on the ancient Jewish belief that prophets died on the same date as either their birth or conception. Thus, linking the conception and death of Jesus to the same date, March 25, would naturally lead to the birth being placed nine months later, on December 25.

The date of Christmas on December 25 has often been linked to the Roman festival of Sol Invictus, or the "Unconquered Sun," which was established by Emperor Aurelian in A.D. 274, several decades after Africanus's death. This festival celebrated the winter solstice and the rebirth of the sun. Some historians have argued that the choice of December 25 for Christmas was influenced by this popular pagan festival, suggesting that the early Church may have sought to replace or overshadow pagan celebrations with a Christian holiday.

However, the argument by Africanus predates the establishment of Sol Invictus, indicating that the selection of December 25 as the birth of Christ was not merely a reactionary move against pagan traditions but had its own theological reasoning. This implies that the Christian identification of December 25 as the birth of Christ likely developed independently of Roman solstice celebrations.

It's important to note that the establishment of December 25 as the universal date for Christmas was a gradual process. In the early Christian Church, there was no consensus on the date of Christ's birth. Different communities celebrated it on various dates, including January 6 (still observed as Epiphany, marking the visit of the Magi, in some traditions). It wasn't until the 4th century, with the increasing influence of Rome in the Christian world, that December 25 began to gain widespread acceptance.

Sextus Julius Africanus's contribution to the dating of Christmas demonstrates an early Christian effort to define a sacred chronology, distinct yet emerging in a world where pagan and Christian traditions were often intertwined. His reasoning reflects the theological and symbolic considerations of early Christian thinkers rather than a mere adaptation of existing pagan festivals. The eventual universal acceptance of December 25 for Christmas highlights the complex interplay of theological, cultural, and historical factors in the formation of Christian liturgical practices.

Claims of Pagan Origins: A Late Development

Surprisingly, there is no historical record of early church fathers connecting Christmas to pagan festivals. The idea that Christmas grew out of pagan origins only emerged in the 12th century, when Dionysius bar-Salibi suggested a connection to Sol Invictus. It wasn't until much later, during the Enlightenment period, that scholars began popularizing the notion that early Christians retrofitted winter solstice festivals for their own purposes.

Why December 25?

The date of December 25 for Christmas is not arbitrary. In the East, Christmas is celebrated on January 6, and this variation suggests that the date was not chosen to mimic pagan celebrations. Instead, it likely has roots in a theological calculation. Early Christians believed that Jesus died on the same date as his conception. This belief was rooted in ancient Jewish traditions that tied significant events to specific times of the year. Therefore, December 25 as the birth of Jesus can be traced back to this theological connection rather than pagan influences.

In conclusion, the historical evidence suggests that Christmas did not originate as a pagan rip-off, as commonly believed. While there may be some synchronistic connections, the date of December 25 for Christ's birth likely has deeper theological roots. As a Greek historian-archaeologist columnist, it's crucial to scrutinize historical narratives and separate fact from fiction, even when it comes to beloved traditions like Christmas.

REFERENCES

Ancient Texts:

1. Clement of Alexandria's Works: Clement of Alexandria (150–215) is one of the early Christian writers who can provide insights into the absence of early Christmas celebrations. You may find his writings in various formats, including online translations.

2. Tertullian's Apologeticum: Tertullian (160–225) is another early Christian writer whose works can be referenced to examine early Christian perspectives on celebrations and holidays. "Tertullian's Apology" is a robust defense of Christianity, addressing the Roman Empire's accusations against Christians. Tertullian counters claims of immorality and social disruption by Christians, arguing that their conduct is ethical and peaceful. He criticizes Roman polytheism and moral standards, contrasting them with Christian virtues. Tertullian appeals for fairness and justice, emphasizing the rationality and moral superiority of Christian beliefs over Roman paganism and advocating for Christians' right to be judged fairly and without prejudice based on their beliefs.

3. Origen's Contra Celsus: Origen (165-264) was known for his intellectual contributions to early Christianity. His writings, particularly his critiques of pagan practices, can be valuable.

4. The Philocalian Calendar: This ancient almanac, mentioned in your article, can provide historical evidence of December 25 being associated with Christmas in the fourth century.

Modern Research:

1. "How December 25 Became Christmas" by Andrew McGowan: The article by Andrew McGowan from Yale Divinity School, mentioned in your article, is an excellent modern source that delves into the historical origins of Christmas.

2. "The Origins of Christmas" by Joseph F. Kelly: This book explores the history and development of Christmas celebrations, including discussions on their relationship to pagan festivals.

3. "Christmas: A Biography" by Judith Flanders: Judith Flanders' book offers an in-depth exploration of the history and evolution of Christmas traditions, shedding light on their ancient roots.